Sermon Blog
|
Sermon Blog
|
Emmanuel Episcopal Church, Greenwood, Virginia
Lent II February 28, 2021 Names are important things. Think about how you got yours. Likely, your name has meaning and connection to family, close friends, or some other major significance. The people who named you thought long and hard for sure. Nowadays, there are books and websites and all kinds of surveys about what names are most popular and, even, which names for people make them more likely to get noticed or become successful. There is a story in my wife’s family that she, being the youngest of six kids, got named by her oldest brother. No kidding. Apparently, he had the chicken pox and the deal was that if he stayed away from her, he could choose her name. As the story goes, he chose Janice, but being a good Catholic family, she had to have some form of Mary in there, thus, she is Janice Marie. That is such a great story, and far more interesting than my super protestant one as I was named for John Marshall, a notable relative who was the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. But he had ten children so there are lots and lots of Johns out there. My mother liked Feilding and Garland, but I can thank my father for nixing those choices. When we have a baptism, we are deliberate in naming the candidate being brought into the faith. We say their name, and not their surname as that indicates their earthly family. Their first or given name is what matters in that ritual, because the family the person is joining is the family of God, so we call that their Christian name. As we look over our biblical passages for the day, there are lots of names in there. Bible names almost always have deep meaning. Adam, for instance, means, literally, first man. Eve comes from the Hebrew word for breath and is indicates that she is one who gives life. When we meet Abram and Sirai in Genesis, God gives them new names indicating their role and function in initiating a forever covenant of love between God and all humanity. Abram becomes Abraham which means father of many nations. Sirai becomes Sarah, which means princess. And given that she will birth a son at 99 years old, that is an apt title. Not only does this give a clue as to their role in the story, it helps all those generations of storytellers keep it straight. Much later, as he is reviewing God’s great love for all, St. Paul harkens back to that ancient naming story to talk about faith. As he encourages the Romans to hold fast to their belief, he points to their common ancestor, father of many nations, to connect them to something really large and important for their identity. Not only is Abraham a great patriarch, he is one who listened to God, and believed in God, sending him on a journey to a new land and a new way of being. It all started with a promise and a new name. When left his fishing boat to follow Jesus, he was called Simon. Later in the story, Jesus quizzes his followers about who people say that he is. Some say he is a giant like the fathers and mothers of old, like an Abraham or a Moses. Others say he is like one of the marquee prophets like Elijah or Isaiah. That is some pretty holy company. But Simon says no, Jesus is the Messiah, the promised savior and deliverer that God’s people have longed for. Seeing as they had been occupied, oppressed, and put down over and over, the Messiah was an almost unimaginable hope and grace bringer. To call Jesus Messiah was to hope against hope that he, right there with them, is God in human form. That rung the bell. Immediately, Jesus gives Simon a new name, a great name, Petrus, the rock, Peter. He will be the cornerstone of building a new thing we know as the church. But good old Peter, who is so painfully human, misses the point so often that we could think of him as rock headed, dense, and hard to move too. With that affirmation behind them, all they seek now is the plan. What will it be Jesus? Will we ride into Jerusalem, take out the Romans and set the chief priests straight? What kind of army will we need? Are you going to bring down all of the God powers of thunder, fire, and show them once and for all what real power is? They are kind of giddy with anticipation. But then we get to today’s announcement. Jesus tells them that the way he will go is the way of suffering and death. He points them to the cross, which is far from the brassy and adorned icon we hold up as a sign of our faith. For them, the cross is an instrument of torture, shame, and defeat. When Peter hears that, it makes no sense. That is not victory. That is not a plan. That is suicidal. Peter takes him aside and lets him know that this is no way to gain followers. But Jesus calls him another name, a searing and harsh name: Satan, telling him that his mind is way to set on earthly things, and not heavenly ones. Then, in terms they cannot understand on their side of the cross, he explains that they (we) all have to take up the cross and suffer too. That is the hard news. And it is not something that even centuries of theology can unravel sensibly. It is the great paradox of following Jesus. All the world shows and tells us is that success is all about winning, about coming out on top, about making ourselves happy and fulfilled on our terms. But, then, there is good news here, if we stick with it. Like Adam, Abraham, Moses and all those prophets, we are just human. We flop and fail and flounder even when we try as we might to look like we are winners. We miss the point again and again. God knows that. He does not ask us to be perfect, he shows us that we are being perfected in a life much larger than the one we know. In his harsh and perplexing way, Jesus tells us that he, that God, has this. God knows what God is doing. We do church to remember that what we see is not all there is. We tell the stories to remember that even when life is hard and does not make sense, God is still God. What the cross shows us is that there is nothing so horrible, so difficult, so shameful, that God cannot redeem even that. And in case we forget, God has a name for all God is, and all God does: the only thing that matters. Love. Amen. Emmanuel Episcopal Church, Greenwood, Virginia
Lent I February 21, 2021 Some close family friends recently birthed a beautiful baby boy. Being thoroughly hip parents, their nursery is lovely, painted in neutral hues of blue and gray. It is a far cry from the days of loud, primary colors when we figured that because children saw primary colors best, we used them everywhere, only to need a paint job when the child was old enough not to want to be a baby any more. There is, however, one ubiquitous feature that seems to have spanned all of decorative evolution. Right there in the hip nursery is a happy painting of the ark, complete with a rainbow, the animals, and a tiny self-satisfied looking Noah. The story does make for some great children’s art, and provides an object lesson for thinking of animals, naming animals, and making their animal sounds. Googling Noah’s ark books yields 18 million results, though I am sure there repeats in there. Nevertheless, we have a curious relationship with this story. If we dig even a little, telling that story is problematic. As it goes, the people God created back in chapter 1 grew wicked, and now in chapter 9, God finds one righteous guy, Noah, and tells him to gather his family and two of each animal, build an immense ark our of gopher wood, and get ready for the rain. Even the young children know this one. They ark floats them to safety, and after forty days (which is Bible speak for a long time), they come to rest on dry land. And now, cue the primary colors. God sets a rainbow in the sky to serve as sign that God will never again send a flood. The promise extends to all living creatures. It is a reboot for creation. What gets glossed over in the story is bound to raise questions as children age. What about the people who perished? Why would God send destructive weather to destroy God’s good creation? This is an apt question for Texans this week, for sure. And that rainbow, that bright sign that is set up as a sign of love and promise, well, is that not a warning too? Here, we have to pull back a bit and see what the authors of this tale are telling us. The original hearers were more than aware that in many cultures and religions that they encountered, there were epic tales of floods and other natural disasters. These tales personified angry gods, fighting with each other, and exacting punishment to demand greater obedience and sacrifice. It is all pretty grim stuff. The authors of the Noah story were not literalists or fundamentalists. They were story tellers. They spin their narratives in concert with other stories in their library, connecting symbols of creation and redemption in loaded language. Back in the beginning, God creates all that is out of the watery void of chaos. Of course, anyone familiar with birthing babies knows that all of us emerge from the watery womb to breathe new life. Look ahead, and we see the Israelites are delivered into freedom through the waters of the Red Sea. They will be in the wilderness for 40 (there’s that number again) 40 years, and will be given a Promised Land. Thus, the flood story takes a horror tale and turns it up on end. It is not about fear. It is about love and redemption, about one God, not many, a God who is creative, not destructive. And that bow, the word is the one also used for an archer’s bow. And as it appears, it is pointed away from the earth, thus the symbol of a weapon is transformed into a sign of peace. As any student of children’s literature will tell you, stories work on many levels. Their appeal is their universality. They tell deep truth with creative artistry. Not everything has to be literal to be true. This is what all good artists know and practice. Consider Van Gough’s Starry Night painting. It captures movement, feeling, and color in a way that a flat photograph or simple drawing never could. Recently, I was forwarded a video of a number van Gough’s paintings set to music. It is sublime and reminded me of the power that art has to capture thought, feeling, emotion, and deep truth. That is one of the reasons to love poetry as it uses and economy of words to paint connective images in the mind. With the rainbow story as a backdrop canvas, we move to another beginning story with Jesus in today’s Gospel. Mark does not tell the Christmas story, rather, he begins with Jesus being baptized. And as he comes out of the water -- you see where this is going – he hears God saying: “You are my Son, the Beloved; with you I am well pleased.” It is said for Jesus to hear and Mark helps us eavesdrop. With the strength of that affirmation, Jesus goes to the wilderness for, you guessed it, forty days. Ding, ding, ding, the stories are connected. God is about delivering Jesus through danger, discomfort, and potential tragedy, to be new life. In the very next sentence, Jesus shows up in Galilee to begin his saving work, announcing: “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near; repent, and believe in the good news.” Jesus is off and running, and Mark will tell his story at a breakneck pace, using evocative language and familiar phrases, drawing on every connection he can make to the bigger story of God with God’s people. Jesus’ story, while connected, is not just another story. Jesus speaks in the present tense, rather than the past tense of fable. The plan of new creation and redemption already embedded, but the truth to which all of the biblical stories point, becomes human, God among us. We will follow this one, carefully. It must be noted that Noah was a great guy, but he turned out to be a drunkard and wildly imperfect. The Israelites, while lively and committed, can be weak kneed and downright self-absorbed, falling down and getting up before God over and over. If God were to be destructive and vengeful, the story would tell of thousands of floods and arks. Jesus knows this. Jesus confronts this. And still, he invites us, all of us, to turn around, see that God is not distant and removed, but very near, so we can believe the good news. We are off and running in the season of Lent. As I have said and written before, we do this season to make space for God to grow us in love. For forty days, (forty, again!) we take on some discomfort, some deprivation, or some new discipline, not to become better or get more holy, but to live into the story, to be brought through whatever watery chaos may be drowning us, and plant our feet on solid ground. In beautiful summary, the Psalmist says: I waited patiently upon the LORD; * he stooped to me and heard my cry. He lifted me out of the desolate pit, out of the mire and clay; * he set my feet upon a high cliff and made my footing sure. He put a new song in my mouth, a song of praise to our God; * many shall see, and stand in awe, and put their trust in the LORD. And you guessed it, that is Psalm… 40. Go figure. Amen. I come from a divided household. When I was growing up, both of my Episcopalian parents took us to Ash Wednesday services. We went to the early service with the bribe of a big greasy breakfast to follow at the Chase Café near our church. So much for fasting, I guess, but after all, we were growing boys.
The divide was not in attending the service, but the tension arose right in the middle of the service. When it was time to come forward for ashes to be imposed on our foreheads, my dad went up, and my mom did not. Inevitably, we would ask why the divide? My mom said that it was not her tradition. My dad responded that we needed all the signs of humility we could get. Growing up Presbyterian, he subscribed to the theory that people were, by nature, a damned mess. If we pressed it further, mom would refer to the gospel lesson where it talks about not practicing our piety before others, not looking dismal, and washing your face. It was a fair point and that has always been an ironic twist in the day’s lessons. My dad came back with the belief that the ashes were not to show off to others, but for us to remember that we aren’t the center of the universe. Neither could convince the other. For familial compromise, I got the ashes, and then washed them off before I went to school. In the end, that made it easier not to have to explain the whole thing to my mostly Baptist friends. This year, we are not imposing ashes on foreheads. These times call for creativity, but I am sure God understands. Churches all over are being changing their practices like we are. Some places are going back to an old tradition of sprinkling ashes on people’s heads to avoid direct contact. That could get messy, but it is not a bad idea as that was done at one point in the Church’s history. Our compromise is this: as you depart today, you will receive a bag in which we have imposed ashes on a card for you to take home and keep throughout Lent. The bag has other resources as well. The ashes we use are made from burning the palms from the last Palm Sunday. In doing a little research, I wondered about this practice. As it happens, this is practical as well as symbolic. Palm ashes are fine, very black, and free of much of the acid found in wood ash. Thus, to get the best ashes, you can make your own, or buy them on the internet, which has made a market for just about everything. As it has been really cold, and we heat with a wood stove as much as possible, we have plenty of ashes around our house, but apparently, those ashes with their high acid content, if mixed with water, form lye, and that is a powerful cleaning agent. If we used wood ashes, we could, literally burn people’s foreheads. While that is not a bad image, it might not be the best practice. What we do know about ashes is that they are what is left over when all of the energy in matter has been converted to heat and light. That science is also good theology. When it comes down to it, we are at our best when we radiate the warmth of God’s love and show the light of Christ in our lives. That is the critical energy of holiness. That is what we are created to be for the world. Thus, when time takes, all that is left of us will be ashen dust. That is a sign. What matters most is what we radiate in the fleeting life we given. For a time, we put away the Alleluias, and we make our worship simple and unadorned. We do this to make space, because sometimes, in our rush to be on our way somewhere, we forget to be still, and give some space to God growing us in love. We may be a mess, but we are God’s mess, and if Easter will show us anything, it will be that there is nothing so dark, so rotten, so not right about us, that God cannot redeem it. Amen. Emmanuel Episcopal Church, Greenwood, Virginia
Last Epiphany February 14, 2021 "We just have to remember the very soil we stand on is common ground, so we can get there. We can make it to the mountaintop through the desert, and we will cross this divide. Our light has always found its way through the darkness. And there's hope on the road up ahead.” Those are powerful and poetic words. They call us to common humanity. They echo the words of Martin Luther King Junior’s “I have a dream” speech, which draws heavily on Moses leading the Israelites out of slavery and toward the Promised Land. They echo John’s Gospel prologue as he draws on the Creation story, where it says: “the light shines in darkness and the did not overcome it.” (John 1:5). Then the words look to a future in hope: a strong evocation of love and life overcoming death and despair. Those are powerful and poetic words and as we know, words have power. These powerful and poetic words are not those of a prayer, though they could be. These powerful and poetic words are not those of a preacher, though they could be. If you were among the 96.4 million viewers of the Super Bowl last Sunday, you may recognize them from an advertisement featuring Bruce Springsteen, the iconic singer, songwriter, and musician. Jeep paid 5.5 million dollars for the two-minute ad, entitled “Meet in the Middle. It did not seem to be about convincing us to purchase a particular automobile, beyond linking the brand to a warm and conciliatory cool factor. As the game was not close and the half-time show was particularly odd, this ad has been among the most talked about and criticized, non-football aspects of this yearly spectacle. It was big news because the 71-year-old Springsteen never, ever, not even in his starving artist Jersey Shore bar band days, has endorsed anything. This prompted cries of Bruce being a sell-out. It is not clear how much, or even if Springsteen got paid. With a net worth of half a billion dollars, he has no need for money, no need advance his career, and no need to make some sort of comeback. His energy is legendary and he has never gone away. The impetus to do this ad comes from something else. The visual images for “Meet in the Middle” are set in the geographical dead center of the lower 48 states, somewhere in Kansa. On that site, there is a small, clearly Christian chapel with a cross hanging on the backdrop of the stars and stripes. Without enumerating all of the arguments, the ad inflamed folks who have now lit up the internet with critical dismissal of the message, the medium, and the man. Extreme opinionates do not cotton to calls for middle ground, as they water down their particular point of view, cultural agenda, and their intense moral and political fervor. Critics have run the whole thing down crying “follow the money,” insinuating that the message is all about sales. Of course, those self-styled purists will not own the fact that their one-sided fervor, with its visceral outrage and mistrust of all others, is great for their own causal attention and fundraising. “Follow the money,” indeed. As a person of faith, one who has grown up with the Boss’s music in the background, and even, seen the Springsteen live, I choose not to share in the cynicism. Sure, I get it, the advertising space can be manipulative in attempted culture shaping, but not all messages are bad simply because of the form in which they are delivered. Advertisements can be effective mirrors, messengers, and thought provokers. The Jeep ad with Bruce Springsteen has a brilliant text. True enough, the images may not speak to everyone, but they speak to some. And in these times, any message of unity, light, and hope is a step in the right direction. There is gospel in those good words, and we lose out if we throw away the message because the envelope is not to our liking. Today’s gospel is an old chestnut of the Church’s proclamation. If you come to church any kind of often, you have heard this story of the Transfiguration. It is fantastical as Jesus goes up the mountain with three of the disciples and suddenly, turns brighter than Clorox white, then he is joined by Moses and Elijah, and Peter. It turns comical as good old lunkhead, Peter, asks if he should build them some little huts so they can all hang out. As is often the case, he gets it all wrong. This is not a stopping place; this is a furthering place. The transfiguration is not just for them, it is for Jesus too. The thundering voice of God says: “This is my Son, the Beloved; listen to him!” It is an echo from Jesus’ baptism. It is a sign pointing forward, and lighting the way. Instead of hanging out in all of the glory, Jesus lights out, heading back into a contentious world that does not understand his Way. From this point on, Jesus is going to Jerusalem. This is the journey we make with him in the Lenten season that begins on Wednesday. We will see that Jesus is not hailed, he is reviled and suspected. His Way is that of subversive love, superseding petty religious regulations, putting people before power, and forgiveness instead of fighting. The mission is not perfected in a mountain top moment. The mission is perfected in one encounter after another, leading to the cross where an instrument of torture that transfigures into a sign of resurrection life. But that is jumping way ahead. To get there requires a journey. And it will not be easily experienced or understood as it unfolds. This takes us back to Springsteen, and his encouragement for folks in this time and place to do the hard work of seeking hope on the road ahead. Does he speak everyone’s language? Hardly. Does the post production work of focus group minded marketers say it all, and do it all, for every person, or even, every American? Obviously, not. There is no one shot deal in the work of transformation. Martin Luther King, Jr. did not eradicate racism. Mother Theresa did not bring about world peac. But they set us on a path and gave us language and examples to follow. Neither of those giants were perfect. And while he is hardly in their league, Springsteen is not going to be perfect either. And yet, as a performer, he knows the of substantial stage that two minutes provides. From his long and successful songwriting career, he also knows that well-crafted words stick to human consciousness, shape human thought and action, and help being about positive change. We can throw away the letter because of the envelope, or we can accept it as a passionate offering, continuing in the ongoing struggle to move us beyond petty and cynical bickering. If we are to come together as God intends, it will require a journey like that of Jesus going to the cross. The work will be contentious at times, and sublime at others. It will ask us to mine our souls for generosity and sacrifice. It will push us to cast off the old ways in which we have missed the mark, and urge us to see, be, and believe differently. "We just have to remember the very soil we stand on is common ground, so we can get there. We can make it to the mountaintop through the desert, and we will cross this divide. Our light has always found its way through the darkness. And there's hope on the road up ahead.” Those are some gospel words. Let’s take them where we can get them, and leave the rest behind. Amen. Emmanuel Episcopal Church, Greenwood, Virginia
Fifth Sunday of Epiphany February 7, 2021 When I was entering the process toward becoming a priest in the Diocese of Virginia, there were a number of hoops I had to jump through to work with the Commission on Ministry. The first of which was a writing assignment wherein I was to narrate my spiritual autobiography, articulating how and why I felt called to ordained ministry in the church. It was daunting to say the least. Being all of 24 years old, all I really knew was that I wanted to offer my time and energy to telling God’s broad and deep story of love as a way of life. I was not sure that I had any real articulate language of calling, but my mentor and I worked on that. My college years were immersed in the poetry of words and that helped. In addition to the biographical component, we were obliged to have a thorough physical exam, and a comprehensive psychological evaluation. This was a whole new education for me, not the physical part, I was an athlete in college and we were checked out regularly and often courtesy of the NCAA rules of order. The psychological thing was completely new to me. My appointed shrink was a testing fanatic. I went through personality indexes, anxiety and depression inventories, and comparative vocational assessments. In the end, I found that I was not all that sane, but about as sane as anyone else. A little knowledge in that arena is a dangerous thing. I will never forget one of the questionnaires and the ensuing conversation. The question was this: “Do you hear voices?” Now, I knew that the proper answer was, of course, “no.” and yet, I was a saucy young adult. I was a child of the 80s and I had heard all kinds of voices telling me who and what I was supposed to be. I said “yes.” My counselor was intrigued. Perhaps the mundane evaluation was about to get interesting. I said, “yes,” and then, unloaded. Yes, the voices in my head had told me that I needed to be productive and upstanding. I needed to be successful. I needed to make money. I needed to climb the ladders of status and social standing. I needed to be svelte and lithe. I needed to be self-actualized and self-aware. I needed to be well regarded and well balanced. I needed to eat like a vegan, workout like a triathlete, and pray like a Buddhist monk. Those were the voices I heard. My counselor was bug eyed but then, acknowledged the demon like voices of cultural expectation. And he passed me as relatively sane. The lessons from Mark’s gospel of late talk a lot about demons. Wherever Jesus goes, he starts with teaching, but that never really gets it, so then, he heals and casts out demons. It may seem like a literary device for Mark. And frankly, we might push that aside and think of it as odd and off-putting. The demons, we rationalize, must be mental illness run amok. And yet, there they are. I think that we push that away at our spiritual peril. Today’s lesson takes us to the Peter’s household. His mother-in-law is sick, and Jesus is expected to help her. As the text says, he took her by the hand, and lifted her up. Those are the same words Mark uses to talk about resurrection. He is not messing around. Jesus is all about helping, giving life, and restoring folks to something important. Touching a sick person was not done, but Jesus does it anyway. The world view at the time was that any sickness, any illness, any malady came from demonic possession: from evil set loose in the body. While we have more information about virology and all that, disease is just what it says: dis-ease. Health challenges alter our life, our feelings, and our outlook. Fighting disease can feel like pitched battle. We are bombarded with messages that tell us that we are not well even if we are. The self-help and diet industry are legion in the post-holiday media. So yes, there are voices, demonic voices, lively and active in our here and now. Mark’s language may sound outdated. And yet, we are beset with all kinds messages telling us that we are not enough. Our skin is not shiny enough. Our bodies are not celebrity tight. We are not the darlings of social media that we may present. In reality, we are all just getting by. We are flawed and foolish, at times, and our lives are messy. If your phone messages and junk mail are anything like mine, you get many calls a day offering further solutions to life’s problems: a warranty, a service, or a program to make us better or safer from catastrophe. I have this lingering fear that my car will break down because I did not buy that extended warranty, I get so many calls about. The Jesus we meet today knows the demons that haunt our souls. In the story with Peter’s mother-in-law, we are told that the demons recognize Jesus, but he will not let them speak. Jesus voice is the antidote to all that pestering negative talk. Jesus is, even, the antidote to dis-ease. He is not laboring under any illusion that we have to be well and whole to be worthy of love. What he comes to show us is that God is with us to quiet the terrors of our hearts and walk with us in the chances and changes of life. God is the One who reaches into our sickness, takes our hand, and lifts us out of whatever desolation we experience. If we are at all honest, we have to admit that the demons of this world surround us, and it is not too strange to own up to the task of naming them so we can silence their destructive, fearful, and hateful voices. When such voices of the world come calling, tune out, turn off, or hang up. The only voice of health, help, and salvation comes from the One who tells us that we are enough. We are beloved. Amen. 4th Sunday After Epiphany 1 Mark 1:21-28 Jan 31, 2021 I love Christmas—-don’t get me wrong. Easter, Thanksgiving, the Fourth of July. I love the big holidays—the getting ready, the spectacle, but I’ve also always been fond of the smaller, quieter, quirky ones. This week marks an important one in the life and rhythm of the spiritual journey through the year: I am talking of course of Groundhog day—February 2nd—which falls this year on Tuesday. I’ve always loved Groundhog Day—as a kid, growing up in New England, Groundhog Day was always if not the beginning of the end of winter, it was the end of the beginning, of that long season of slipping our feet into plastic bread loaf bags before sliding them into our rubber boots, in a futile effort to keep our feet dry wading through the slush on our way to the bus stop in the endless gray mornings. Groundhog Day was always the first of the triduum marking the journey out of Winter—soon followed by the arrival of Girl Scout Cookies and baseball spring training. So you can imagine my joy and surprise when my little holiday became a movie: 1993’s Groundhog Day. Bill Murray played TV weatherman Phil Connors—-a deeply flawed, narcissistic, egotistic, horrible, self- loathing human being—who is sent to Punxsutawney PA to report on the Groundhog Day festival. Phil, ever the narcissist, looks down on the town and its people as beneath him, and when a sudden blizzard— which he predicted would pass them by—arrives and snows the town in, he has to spend the night. When he awakes the next morning at 6AM—-spoiler alert on a 25 year old movie—he finds it’s February 2nd, Groundhog Day, and he’s forced to repeat the day. Again. And again. And again. And again. Part of how the movie works is there’s no explanation—he’s not visited by ghosts or assisted by angel looking for his wings, there’s no Doctor or Tardis, no extraterrestrial orb—it’s just Phil, and the eternal repeating of one mundane gray day. Harold Ramis, the writer and director, speculated while writing the script that Phil Connors spends 3000 years in Punxsutawney, repeating the same day. 3000 years. Phil goes through all the stages of existential despair—including trying to kill the Groundhog—before finally learning to embrace profoundly the strange grace of the day. He find joys in the small things, learns to play the piano, and finds ways to help the townspeople he once loathed—and in the process, learning how to love himself. Theologians love this movie. It’s perhaps the best artistic treatment of the concept of purgatory since Dante Alighieri wrote Purgatorio as part of his Divine Comedy in the 14th century. Dante’s description was no less mystical than Ramis’: Dante envisioned a seemingly endless, repeating cycle of existential despair, with the souls of the not damned but not worthy circling a seemingly endless cycle of rooms. The last room featured two doors—an easy one, which led back into the labyrinth—and a hard one—a door surrounded by fire. If the soul that had followed the seemingly endless meandering walk could come to the fiery door and walk through—unscathed—it was free to ascend to paradiso. Growing up Roman Catholic, I always disliked the idea of purgatory: I’d argue with the Catholic priests about it (before I realized I was a Protestant), not finding purgatory anywhere in the Bible or at all consistent with the idea of a loving and redeeming God. I remember my response to Dante: maybe not the “Bah! Humbug!” of Ebeneezer Scrooge, more of a “Really?” Now? In 2021? I’ll be honest, I’m not so sure anymore. We’ve been through what seems like our own version of purgatory this past year. A year ago this week, we marked in the United States our first cases and first death from the Coronavirus, Covid 19: now, a year later, we have exceeded the total of US combat deaths in WW2. Every day this month we’ve averaged more deaths than on 9/11—Every. Day. We’ve grown numb to it. While the arrival of vaccines give us hope, our numbness to it all—-All. Of. It—-grows. And soon we return to Lent—our Second Lent of the Rona—and we remain distanced, apart, afar, disconnected, and uncertain. We need to prepare ourselves and be mindful for the emotions of grief and alienation that the Second Lent of Covid may create. Bragaw 4th Sunday After Epiphany 2 Mark 1:21-28 Jan 31, 2021 Dante’s purgatory was marked in part by the absence of a sense of time; our own sense of time has been challenged this year, and this is a real thing. The Dutch-American psychologist Bessel van der Kolk describes in The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma how traumatic stress forms memory differently, in how the chemicals driven by stress change our perception of time in the creation of medium term memory. There’s a reason why Christmas seems like five years rather than five weeks ago—the mind is literally recording time differently. Our minds are seeing things and remembering things and processing things differently. And maybe there’s a strange grace in that? Maybe the strange grace of this--all of this—is that we are seeing and processing and remembering differently? The strange grace of disorientation and grief lets us approach and enter into today’s Gospel differently than we would’ve the last time we heard this text in late January 2019. Which is good: make no mistake, this is a deeply strange passage but incredibly powerful story in the Gospel of Mark. It’s a gift to look at it anew. It’s the beginning of Jesus’ ministry, in the first chapter of Mark, and he’s returning with his newly-called band of followers to his hometown. Not where he was born—Bethlehem—not where he grew up— Nazareth—but to the hometown he chose to live in as an adult: Capernaum, on the far north coast of the Sea of Galilee. This is a pivotal story in Mark’s Gospel. Mark is the oldest of the Gospels—we believe it was first, for a host of good reasons—and it’s different in many ways: shorter, more concise, with an accelerated narrative, and it’s kind of the gritty, kinetic action movie version of the Gospels, compared to the measured Rabbinic teaching of Matthew, the stately journey to Jerusalem of Luke, or the ethereal otherworldliness of John. Two vitally important things happen in this story: we find out a lot about who Jesus is by what he does; but we also find out a lot about the the people of Galilee. What do we learn about Jesus? One of the main ways Mark is different is who Jesus is, and what he does, and what are the signs we should be looking for: Mark’s Jesus is a healer—and he’s an exorcist. The two actions go together—Jesus heals, and he casts out demons. In Mark’s narrative they are paired tasks— they’re related. Again and again through Mark, Jesus and the disciples move from town to town—Jewish and Gentile—around the Sea of Galilee, healing the sick, exorcising demons, and fleeing the town in their boat, one step ahead of the law. The exorcism in the synagogue in Capernaum stands out—not because it was the most dramatic—but because it’s the first sign of Jesus’ public ministry. THIS is how he begins his ministry. What do we learn about the people? This is what defines Mark’s Gospel: Jesus remains a mystery to the people. This is vital to understand Mark, and it starts with today’s passage and two stories that follow. Jesus returns to his adopted hometown and proclaims the Gospel, and the people who knew him as an adult— the good people of the synagogue of Capernaum—are amazed, but are deeply skeptical. In the next chapter, his hometown—Nazareth? He’s rejected and driven out—not just by the people—but his family — by his brothers and sisters, and his Mom. Again and again in Mark, the disciples, his family, his hometown—reject him. They don’t see who he is. But the key to Mark’s mystery is the one group of characters in Mark who ALWAYS recognize him, who call him by his name, his real name? Bragaw 4th Sunday After Epiphany 3 Mark 1:21-28 Jan 31, 2021 The Demons. "What have you to do with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us? I know who you are, the Holy One of God." They always call him by his real name. They always recognize who he is and what he represents. And they always resist. And Jesus always casts them out. Now, if you had asked me when we heard this last? Demons? Exorcisms? I would’ve waived it away. How about it we preach on the psalm appointed for the week? Now? I’ll be honest, I’m not so sure anymore. So what do we do with this? Dante offers two doors out—an easy one and a hard, fiery one. One response I think is to look for the easy grace, find the comfort in the vaccines and the coming of Spring and say something like, “let us resolve to go forth and fight the demons we see, to do the work of the Gospel”, and to, maybe channel some Lincoln: “We are not enemies, but friends....Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory... will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.” But that’s the easy door, and I think it leads back to the maze. The hard way out—the fiery door—is to sit with the questions: ——-Why are the townspeople of Capernaum—who knew Jesus—unable to see who he is? ——-Why are the Demons able to see who Jesus is while those who knew him best—his friends and his family—unable to? Why did the townspeople not see who Jesus was even when the Demons called him out? These questions are the essence of Mark’s mystery, that Mark is inviting us to sit with and make us uncomfortable. I’d add a third question: Why were the townspeople, the citizens of the synagogue in Capernaum, unable to see the Demon in their midst? Was it just fear? Were they afraid to see the world differently? Was confronting the demon just too much? Did they choose not to see—Jesus, or the Demon—or could they just not see? Did the demon represent something that was socially unacceptable to talk about in synagogue? Was it more polite, comfortable, and pleasant to just ignore the Demon in their midst? Which leads to the frightening question: by ignoring the demon, was it more also polite, comfortable, pleasant and socially acceptable to ignore the presence of the very Son of Man in their own midst? And here’s the strange grace Mark offers us—are we like the good people of Capernaum—refusing to see either God or the devil? What demons lurk within our midst, protected by our silence? Addiction? Systematic racism? A justice system still stepped in the toxic poison of white supremacy? What saving grace stands in our presence, unacknowledged by our fear of the disruption it would create to dismantle these demons? And may we use the strange grace offered by this time of plague, disruption, and disunity, to be willing to see the world around us with new eyes and open hearts. Amen. |
AuthorThe Rev. John Thomas is Rector of Emmanuel Episcopal Church, Greenwood Archives
October 2024
Categories |
Telephone |
|